Why am I so ill-tempered when I read a sensible report like "Bridging the Gap: How to Strengthen the Pk-16 Pipeline to Improve College Readiness"?
The authors, Ulrich Boser and Stephen Burd, know their stuff. The sponsoring organization, New America Foundation, has a great reputation. (Bias alert: It also employs one of my sons as a senior fellow, but he does California politics and direct democracy, not national education policy.)
My problem is that smart and industrious experts like Boser and Burd often unearth startling facts but don't follow through. "Bridging the Gap," available at Newamerica.net, details the large percentage of first-year college students in remedial courses and the duplication in federal college preparation programs. This is interesting information of which few people are aware.
But their recommendations follow the standard line: Let's have more meetings and spend more money. Example: "We recommend that the federal government provide states with incentives to come together and adopt national college and work-readiness standards in math, science and the language arts."
Or: "The federal government should work directly with states to foster partnerships between high schools and postsecondary institutions to smooth the transition between high school and college."
You might think that sounds reasonable. I think it misses an opportunity. Why not harness the energy and ambition of a new president to shake things up?
The Obama administration doesn't have much money to spend getting more students ready for college. The Education Department's $100 billion in stimulus funds will mostly go to less sophisticated projects that create jobs fast.
| Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas