Under the measure, the school board would gradually transition from seven appointed members to six elected and three appointed members. The current school board believes the bill is too vague and that the transition will be difficult. But the bill clearly outlines the proposed changes, and only a couple of minor details need to be worked out.
Contrary to the board's objection, the difficulty of the transition would likely be minimal. In order for three board members' terms to end on June 30, 2011, one board member's term would be lengthened by a year, and another's would be shortened. On July 1, 2011, three elected board members would take office along with two appointed members. The board members in office on July 1, 2011 would serve for four years, and in the next election cycle six members would be elected.
So the school board's vocal opposition is misleading. Why should these minor issues prevent Harford County's constituents from influencing how their tax dollars are spent on their children's education? Despite prior bills, Harford County is one of the last counties in which voters cannot elect school board members.
| Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas