Take a Walk on the Wired Side

Rob Weir:

Summer is coming, a time in which many colleges seek instructors to teach online courses. These are cash cows for campuses, a way to enhance the revenue stream without having to keep facilities open. (Or better yet, making those facilities available for outside groups to rent.) Math, business, and computer science professors have blazed the trail, but online teaching remains problematic in word-heavy disciplines such as the humanities, and it has a mixed record in hands-on laboratory-based sciences. (Biologists often complain that computer simulations are, at best, simulacra.) Teaching online can be rewarding, but be wary before you agree to tackle such a course.

There are several seemingly counterintuitive experiences I've had with online courses. In summary:

* Older students generally perform better than younger ones.
* The range of achievement is much narrower.
* Online courses work best when they mirror live classes.
* Discussion is generally more robust online.
* An online course definitely will not run itself!

Younger students love the idea of online courses, but they are often the worst students -- despite their greater facility with technology. Yahoo! runs ads for "Why online college is rocking," and that's part of the problem. Online education is being sold as if it's for everyone, when those finding real success are those who are self-motivated, highly organized, and in possession of well-developed study habits. And how many of your young undergrads fit that profile? Younger students approach online classes as if they're just another "cool" thing to do on the Web. Be prepared to badger them if you want them to get through your course.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at May 13, 2009 1:44 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas