The shadow schools secretary and his ilk think of themselves as opponents of fascism in its various forms. They are mistaken.
The British parliament last month passed the Academies Act, allowing parents to start tax-funded schools free from local-authority control. Ed Balls, the shadow education secretary, does not like the act. He fears it will create "social apartheid" in education.
Most people agree that South Africa's apartheid laws were abominable. But, after Mr. Balls's remark, I am not sure we all agree on what was wrong with them. My objection, which I had thought to be universal, is that apartheid limited people's freedom of association. To take but one outrageous example, it was illegal for a black and a white to marry each other.
But this cannot be what Mr. Balls thinks was wrong with South Africa's racial apartheid because the social separation that might result from parent-run schools would be voluntary. The Academies Act does not force parents to start schools, it allows them to. Unlike South Africa's apartheid laws, it does not limit freedom of association but expands it.
| Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas