The Faculty Sabbatical on the Chopping Block

Christine Hurt

A blurb in the Chronicle of Higher Education notes that the Iowa legislature, in the face of shrinking budgets, is rattling swords at faculty sabbaticals, stating that it is unfair that academics would get paid semester or year leaves while other employees feel the budget pain. This statement caught my eye and get my mind swirling:

1. It's almost impossible to explain a sabbatical to nonacademics and have it seem necessary. Sabbaticals are fairly unknown in most professions. I've heard of ministers getting sabbaticals and a million years ago a few law firms mentioned having sabbaticals, but they definitely aren't part of the average American worker's salary and benefits package.

2. The name "sabbatical" sounds like a rest. Making the argument that folks that do no physical labor need periodic rest is tough.

3. If a university expects faculty to apply for a sabbatical by proposing doing research or scholarly project during the sabbatical, then it is not a paid rest. In that case, a sabbatical is merely a research leave. If faculty are required to produce scholarship, and this is explicit in tenure, promotion and raise standards, then a sabbatical is merely time given to meet the requirements of the job. Perhaps re-branding is necessary: a "research intensive"? If sabbaticals are used for mere relaxation, travel or outside work, then they seem more "cut-worthy" in an era of shrinking budgets.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at December 6, 2010 1:50 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas