LIFO is Bad for Kids

EdReformer

"The sponsor of a bill that would make teacher effectiveness the main determining factor during layoffs says that the proposal is worth billions of dollars in school improvement," the AP in the Tacoma News Tribune reported last week. Senator Rodney Toms thinks seniority protections in teacher contracts that result in last-in-first-out (LIFO) doesn't make sense for kids.

There's nothing out there that I could do this year that makes a multibillion-dollar difference in education other than this legislation," he said. "To leave billions of dollars on the table because we like the status quo is unacceptable."

Tom said any other initiative aimed at improving student learning as much as one that ensures the best teachers remain in the classroom would cost the state billions of dollars. In other words, if his proposal is ignored and the system remains unchanged, a big potential savings would be lost, he argues.

Tom's bill, Senate Bill 5399, would require school districts facing layoffs to first lay off teachers who received the lowest average evaluation ratings during their two most recent evaluations, based on a formula that gives a weight of 60 percent to the most recent evaluation and 40 percent to the previous one.

An AIE release today supports Sen. Toms bill:

Posted by Jim Zellmer at February 4, 2011 1:14 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas