|
December 5, 2011Dropping cursive isn't a capital ideaThere's a debate brewing - mostly via keyboards - about whether schools still need to teach cursive writing to classrooms of digitally wired kids.Posted by Jim Zellmer at December 5, 2011 1:52 AM Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas Comments
Define "cursive" writing. When I was learning cursive over 50 years ago, it seemed there was an agreed upon standard. Over the years, it has become obvious, there was no such standard. But writing cursively is really not a goal in itself. I do remember one embarrassing incident in the late '70s. I had written something so illegible that I couldn't read it, and I had to beseech my friend Beth to decode it -- she was very good at that. Legibility and speed has become something of an issue. I have tried to rework some of my writing habits to speed up writing and still keep the writing understandable. Some cursive writing now discourages connecting every letter. For example, both legibility and speed suggests that in "gh", there should be no connection, since the tail of the "g" requires a stroke in a backwards direction and a loop motion, and a high stroke at the beginning of the "h". Best to "air pen" and start the "h" separate from the "g". The letters that are most prone to illegibility are "unread notes" (great acronym). Another interesting point, at least to me. I found a discussion on how to stroke letters for printing. One set of stroke recommendations are based on how to print while you were on a month-long journey by stagecoach. In this case, one makes each letter with multiple small strokes so that one could build up each letter between bumps and jars, and the clip and clops of the horses' hooves. Post a comment
|