Budget & Wisconsin School Accountability

Mike Ford:

The perils of another strategy, finding lower-cost ways to deliver state services, shows up in another Journal Sentinel story this morning on the notable absence of a common school accountability system for all schools receiving public revenue in a new piece of education legislation. Erin Richards writes of the bill:What is not mentioned in the story is that an identical public, private, and charter school accountability system is functionally impossible, and undesirable. The presence of religion in private choice schools for example requires that the schools spend (and document the purpose of) every dollar they receive annually through the choice program so as not to have a surplus that could be seen as aiding religion. In comparison, having and carrying over a surplus in a public school district may actually be a sign of responsible budgeting. And the heart of the charter school concept is a third party authorizer that serves as the accountability agent. A common accountability system undermines the very idea of a charter school.

More important, if choice and charter face identical public school rules and regulations, there is every reason to expect them to be nothing more than poorly funded public schools that may save the state money, but not increase educational quality. What is needed is a way to ensure all of our schools are accountable and transparent, not identical regulation.

Related: notes and links on Madison's multi-million dollar Infinite Campus expedition... I'm not sure that a state-wide system makes sense. Rather, the state might create a set of data reporting "standards" that allows local Districts to collect and manage information in the way that they prefer.

More from Erin Richards Wisconsin Accountability article, here:

Its elements include:

A proposal to create a fund to which private donors could contribute money to fund successful literacy and early-childhood development programs.

A proposal to require schools to annually assess all kindergartners for reading readiness.

A proposal to require new elementary and special education teachers to pass a more rigorous reading test.

A proposal for education schools to submit to DPI a list of graduates and their graduation dates, so that the state can better link practicing teachers back to their institution of training.

A proposal to evaluate the performance of all public school teachers and principals.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at February 13, 2012 3:50 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas