How Wide Are the Racial Opportunity Gaps in Your Metro?
Margery Turner:
In December, MetroTrends graded America's 100 biggest metros on measures of economic security. Today we offer a new report card, with grades reflecting the opportunity gaps facing African Americans and Latinos.
We're all well aware of the national story. Despite the huge achievements of the civil rights era, neither African Americans nor Latinos (on average) enjoy the same school quality, job opportunities, or homeownership access as whites. But the picture isn't the same in every metro area. So our report card scores metros on five factors: residential segregation, neighborhood affluence (for the average black, Latino, and non-Hispanic white), public school quality (for the average black, Latino, and non-Hispanic white student), employment (among working-age adults), and homeownership.
Let's start by looking at the grades for black-white equity. 
Surprised? The top scorers are mostly small- to medium-sized metros in the south and west (Charleston, SC, and Riverside, CA, for example), while the worst performers are big metros in the midwest and northeast (including New York, Boston, and Chicago).
When I first saw these results, I thought perhaps that so few African Americans live in the high-scoring metros that their high performance is irrelevant. For some top scorers (like Albuquerque and San Jose), that's definitely the case. But lots of other metros scoring As and Bs on this report card have substantial African American populations.
Madison was
given a C on Racial Equity. Milwaukee is the worst while Albuquerque is the best.
Related:
Posted by Jim Zellmer at February 19, 2012 5:23 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: 
Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas
