Dangers lurk in move to open-access publishing

Stuart Macdonald:

The UK government's working group on expanding access to published research findings reported last June. The intention of the Finch report is admirable, the effort misguided. The report concentrates on how academic research will be published. It rather neglects what research will be published.

Dame Janet Finch, advised less by academics than by organisations with interests in academic publishing, recommends open access - but open access to what? Perhaps only to the publications from which these organisations benefit most. Access to research findings unapproved by these organisations is likely to become more difficult.

Producing a vast report on academic publishing that does not mention research assessment is something of an accomplishment. Research assessment dominates academic life and academic publishing dominates research assessment. Publication in top journals is the main indicator of academic performance, determining salary, careers, research grants and a goodly slice of institutional funding.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at April 8, 2013 1:04 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas