Despite cosmetic changes, concerns about education years ago still linger

Alan Borsuk:

I had a depressing experience a few nights ago. (Don't worry, I'll end on a more optimistic note.) Someone sent me an email, asking for a copy of a story about him that ran in the Milwaukee Journal in 1986. He said I wrote it. This was totally news to me, but it turned out the guy was right. Glad to help.

My life was better organized in those days. I kept scrapbooks. In the course of trying to help this person, I found one with stories I wrote in 1986. I paged through it and came upon a story from September of that year about the gap in success between black students and white students in Milwaukee. The story was based on observations in classrooms, data and interviews.

The depressing part: With some cosmetic changes, that story could appear right here, right now. No one would think it was out of date. Twenty-seven years ago! In the big picture, so little has changed.

Here are some of the central points from the 1986 article:

"Many black children are not getting support from their homes that would help them do well in school."

"Economic poverty is connected to academic poverty."

"While some teachers are excellent, others can hardly control a classroom."

"The dominant classroom characteristic of many students is indifference, not misbehavior."

"Extremely high pupil turnover within schools impairs the progress of children."

The story described a middle-grade class where students were engaged and doing good work under one teacher. Her period ended and the next teacher took over the same class -- and disorder reigned.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at October 14, 2013 12:56 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas