the post-MOOC-hype landscape: what's REALLY next?

Bonnie Stewart:

The short version (see slide 4) is this: there are currently two solitudes in the MOOC conversation, and it's not a cMOOC/xMOOC divide. One solitude - the mainstream media discourse - is essentially a unicorn, in the sense that its promises are fantasies of salvation and solutionism that have very little to do with the actual practice of higher education. The other - the practitioners' discourse(s), broadly represented by the various interests around the table at #mri13 - is a Tower of Babel. Still, this solitude, loosely and cacophonously affiliated as it is, nonetheless leans towards discussing MOOCs in terms of learning. And in the wake of twenty-odd months of hype in which the dominant public narratives about higher ed have been all glorious revolution or ghastly spectre, I think it's time to seize this (likely momentary) lull in unicorn sales and try to talk about MOOCs as learning. We need to make ourselves familiar with what the post-hype landscape of higher ed looks like, and address the issues and opportunities it's left us with. In learning terms. On as many public platforms as we can. In stereo.

In other words, challenge the empty narratives that your administrators or your faculty have been sold. Find ways to talk about why what you're doing matters. Change the narrative from unicorns back to what education is about: learning. End story.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at December 17, 2013 12:05 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas