The US should encourage Arabic language students, not criminalise them

Anna Lekas Miller:

In August of 2009, Nicholas George boarded a flight from Philadelphia to Los Angeles. He was on his way back to university at Pomona College.

While he was going through airport security, a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agent discovered Arabic language flashcards in his carry-on luggage.

He was pulled aside, detained and interrogated for five hours - two of which were allegedly spent in handcuffs.

"Do you know who did 9/11?" one of the TSA agents allegedly asked.

"Osama bin Laden," George responded.

"Do you know what language he spoke?"

"Arabic"

"Do you see why these cards are suspicious?"

Nicholas George was released when it became clear that neither he nor his flashcards posed a threat to US national security. George went on to try to sue the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for violating his first and fifth amendment rights. Last week -more than four years after the incident - the case was dismissed.

In other words, it is legal and legitimate to detain and interrogate a traveller on the grounds of suspicion from Arabic language flashcards alone.

As an Arab-American who came of age post-9/11, I am frustratingly resigned to the well-documented fact that airports are often hostile places for Arab and Muslim-Americans. Watching my white father effortlessly glide through airport security while my brown mother is frequently "randomly selected" to be stopped, searched and asked to show the contents of her bag is evidence of this in and of itself. However, detaining a traveller for Arabic language flashcards brings this flagrant racism and criminalization of all things Arab, Middle Eastern and Muslim (as the three are often conflated) to a whole new level.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at January 4, 2014 12:33 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas