This piece is particularly fascinating.
Summers calls for an “aggressive reform agenda” to put excellence over identity, truth over social justice. Says it won’t happen via normal processes that “give[s] too much power to faculty members who have political agendas.”
Abdel Abdellaoui, Hilary C. Martin and Peter M. Visscher
In civilizations, individuals are born into or sorted into different levels of socio-economic status (SES). SES clusters in families and geographically, and is robustly associated with genetic effects. Here we first review the history of scientific research on the relationship between SES and heredity. We then discuss recent findings in genomics research in light of the hypothesis that SES is a dynamic social construct that involves genetically influenced traits that help in achieving or retaining a socio-economic position, and can affect the distribution of genes associated with such traits. Social stratification results in people with differing traits being sorted into strata with different environmental exposures, which can result in evolutionary selection pressures through differences in mortality, reproduction and non-random mating. Genomics research is revealing previously concealed genetic consequences of the way society is organized, yielding insights that should be approached with caution in pursuit of a fair and functional society.
A person close to X said Harper’s case “raises a concern that [X] users’ speech might be curtailed if the government is allowed to have access to users’ data without a court-approved search warrant”.
They added: “This issue is not specific to X. It means that the constitution does not prevent the government from snooping through any user’s account on any social media platform or financial platform.”
The timing of the intervention by X — the only individual corporation to have filed a brief in the case to date — is notable given the Trump administration’s use of public material on social media to vet migrants.
The Department of Homeland Security last month proposed broadening the collection of social media account handles from visa applicants and those wishing to apply for residence in the US.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
By Reuters
The investigations were “just the beginning” of the Justice Department’s attempt to eradicate DEI programs, the media release said.
Stanford University said in a statement it began taking steps to comply with the Supreme Court decision immediately after it was issued.
“We continue to be committed to fulfilling our obligations under the law. We do not have details about today’s announcement, but we look forward to learning more about their concerns and responding to the department’s questions,” Stanford spokesperson Dee Mostofi said in an email.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The University of California said it has adhered to a ban on affirmative action in admissions since California voters approved one in the ballot initiative Proposition 209 in 1996.
The results of nationwide testing show that students in Oklahoma lag behind students in nearly all of the 50 states when it comes to reading proficiency. Those results represent more than hardship for individual students or a loss of bragging rights for state officials.
According to experts, Oklahoma’s low reading outcomes also translate into a significant, lifelong drain on taxpayer resources and the state economy as students emerge from the K-12 system unprepared for work or college.
A recent report from the Education Consumers Foundation, “The Cost of Failure to Teach Reading: Projections From 3rd Grade Reading Scores,” shows millions of dollars in increased taxpayer expenses are likely to occur in Oklahoma given the many children who do not read proficiently in the state.
“For every student who fails to master reading by grade 3, taxpayers are subjected to what amounts to a hidden annual surtax—one that cumulates with each graduating class,” the report stated. “It is levied in the form of added local, state, and federal tax-funded resources absorbed by the resulting school dropouts and unprepared graduates.”
The reason for the added taxpayer cost is simple: Students who do not learn to read are far more likely to be unemployed or underemployed as adults and therefore rely more on government services.
——-
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Link:
It has to do with Justice Jackson’s comments that when Black newborns are delivered by Black doctors, they’re much more likely to survive, justifying racially discriminatory admissions.
We now know the study contained fraud🧵
I’ll start with their least bad offenses, before moving to the worst of it.
Firstly, the authors were warned not to make causal claims because they lacked the fixed effect I said they needed. They made those claims anyway.
Worth watching, especially for anyone skeptical on DOGE.
@AntonioGracias is one of my closest friends, one of the most exceptional people I know and extremely high integrity.
Grateful to him, Elon and many others for serving 🇺🇸 at DOGE.
https://richardzach.org/2025/03/accessible-open-textbooks-in-math-heavy-disciplines/The challengeThe authoring platform of choice in many math-heavy disciplines is LaTeX. It produces typeset documents of excellent quality and handles formulas and mathematical diagrams extremely well. Practically every researcher or instructor in mathematics, physics, and computer science is adept at using it, and it has a wide user base outside these core disciplines as well (e.g., philosophy and economics).
Unfortunately, it only produces PDF output. PDF is not an accessible format: it does not scale well to display on tablets or phones, text does not reflow, it contains no semantic information (e.g., what’s a heading or what’s a list), images, formulas, and diagrams are only visually accessible. This creates difficulties for readers who rely on alternative presentations of material (in other colors, text sizes, fonts, or in non-visual formats, i.e., audio or Braille) or who simply want to access the material on a device not the size of a printed page (e.g., on a smartphone or small e-reader).
Underly received about $850,000 from the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, out of the $1.1 million she’s raised since February. Kinser received almost $1.7 million from the Republican Party of Wisconsin, out of about $2.2 million raised total, according to her committee report and a late filing.
Kinser, who has never been elected to public office, said Tuesday night she is proud of the campaign she ran and she won’t stop working for children.
“We cannot settle for only three out of 10 children reading well enough to go to college or have a career,” Kinser said.
——-
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
Link:
FPF recently collaborated with Wiredto allow the magazine to stop paywalling articles that are primarily based on public records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. “Public records are disappearing. The National Archive is in disarray,” Stern said. “It’s going to be harder and harder to get documents out of the administration.”
He added that citizens can protect press freedom on paper, but that’s not enough.
“But if there’s not a functional, viable press to use those protections and to carry out that work, then everything you’ve accomplished is academic,” Stern said. “So I think the first thing folks can do to support the press is subscribe to their news outlets and put some money in news outlets’ pockets and in journalists’ pockets so they can continue to exist.”
Around 2 a.m. on an otherwise unremarkable Tuesday, I launched a public database mapping all 3,805 non-faculty employees of Brown University and sent each one a simple email: What do you do all day?
Ostensibly, it was a journalistic inquiry. The site, which I named Bloat@Brown, was somewhere between FaceMash (Mark Zuckerberg’s college project that scraped student ID photos and let users rank who was hotter) and DOGE. But instead of using Zuckerberg’s ELO-style rankings — a numerical method originally developed for ranking chess players — my site, Bloat@Brown, used retrieval-augmented generation and a custom GPT-4o pipeline to rank administrators by their operational importance.
First, I scraped the internet — job boards, the student newspaper, LinkedIn — to gather whatever I could about each employee. I fed that data into GPT-4o mini to generate a rough utility ranking. The results weren’t definitive — there is only so much information on the public web — but they seemed directionally accurate. (Like obvious DEI jobs triggered a DEI filter, for instance.)
While my roommate slept, I worked from the common room in my dorm’s basement — the same room that floods whenever it rains and thus has plastic tarps, industrial fans, and wet floor signs permanently set up despite Brown’s tuition and fees rising to $93,064 a year. Brown’s financial woes also mean that the school runs a $46 million annual budget deficit while professors constantly complain they’re underpaid. So, where is our $93,064 a year actually going?
After doing some digging, I discovered that much of the money is being thrown into a pit of bureaucracy. The small army of 3,805 non-faculty administrators is more than double the faculty headcount, and makes for roughly one administrator for every two undergrads. In the US, the cost of college tuition has far outpaced inflation because, for one, administrative staff count has drastically outpaced growth in the student population — a cause for concern since, in the 20th century, universities were affordable and ran fine with a fraction of today’s staffers.
The federal higher-education apparatus that’s so familiar today was far more modest under Reagan or George H.W. Bush. While the federal role expanded significantly during the 1990s, with new lending programs, tax credits, and Clintonite initiatives, the George W. Bush administration focused its education efforts on K-12. (Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings’ second-term Commission on the Future of Higher Education was laudable but didn’t ultimately amount to much.)
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon has inherited a deep roster and an aggressive game plan.The modern era of turbocharged federal involvement in higher education really commenced during the Obama years. The Obama team ran wild: weaponizing Title IX, devising onerous new “gainful employment” regulations for for-profit (and only for-profit) colleges, making Washington the nation’s sole source of college lending, and unilaterally rewriting the terms of the brand-new Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.
During Trump’s first term, Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos chose not to respond in kind. Instead, she mostly sought to restore the traditional order. A principled Reagan conservative focused on expanding K-12 school choice, DeVos didn’t have much of a playbook or mandate for higher education, other than trying to undo some of the Obama-era excesses.
A researcher who argued that infant mortality is higher for black newborns with white doctors because of racial bias omitted a variable from the paper that “undermines the narrative,” according to the researcher’s internal notes.
The study forms a keystone of the racial concordance field, which hypothesizes patients are better served by medical providers of the same race, and has served as a rationale for affirmative action. It faces new questions just as universities move to defund their Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs or face legal action.
The August 2020 study in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) concluded that the gap in mortality rates between black newborns and white newborns declines by 58% if the black newborns are under the care of black physicians. A possible driver of the phenomenon could include a “spontaneous bias” by white physicians toward the babies, the researchers wrote.
The paper’s most high-profile booster was Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who cited it as evidence for the benefits of affirmative action in her dissent in the 2023 Supreme Court ruling Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which found that universities that considered the race of college applicants had violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: University Spent Over $200,000 On ‘Diversity’ Course Teaching Physicians That Healthcare Is Racist)
“For high-risk Black newborns, having a Black physician is tantamount to a miracle drug: it more than doubles the likelihood that the baby will live,” reads an amicus brief filed by the Association of American Medical Colleges. “Yet due to the enduring and significant underrepresentation of minorities in the health professions, many minority patients will not receive care from a racially diverse team or from providers who were trained in a diverse environment.”
More.
In some sense, AI tutors prove more useful for students for the exact same reasons that high-quality human tutors have always been effective. “When you have that one-on-one instruction, or small group instruction, the instruction caters to your needs,” Sal Khan—founder of Khan Academy—told us in November. “If a student is finding something easy, then a tutor can move ahead or go deeper. If they’re struggling, a tutor can slow down.”
In another study from last year, an AI-powered tutor helped Harvard undergraduates learn physics more effectively—and in less time. To optimize the bot for learning, the researchers prompted it with a set of constraints—including “Only give away ONE STEP AT A TIME, DO NOT give away the full solution in a single message,” and “You may CONFIRM if their ANSWER is right, but DO NOT tell [students] the answer.”
One hundred and eighty-six physics undergrads were split into two groups: Half received a standard physics lecture, and the other half stayed home to work through the same material under the guidance of the AI tutor. When the researchers compared students’ scores on a pre- and post-lesson assessment of the material, “the learning gains for students… in the AI-tutored group were over double those for students in the active lecture group.” The AI tutor group also worked through the material 10 minutes faster than their peers—and reported higher levels of engagement and motivation.
Paige Bright, Alan Edelman, Steven G. Johnson
This course, intended for undergraduates familiar with elementary calculus and linear algebra, introduces the extension of differential calculus to functions on more general vector spaces, such as functions that take as input a matrix and return a matrix inverse or factorization, derivatives of ODE solutions, and even stochastic derivatives of random functions. It emphasizes practical computational applications, such as large-scale optimization and machine learning, where derivatives must be re-imagined in order to be propagated through complicated calculations. The class also discusses efficiency concerns leading to “adjoint” or “reverse-mode” differentiation (a.k.a. “backpropagation”), and gives a gentle introduction to modern automatic
Last year, I wrote about a specific, promising development in Wisconsin: the state published the strongest ELA curriculum list in the country.
Unfortunately, the work in Wisconsin prior to that development, and since, underwhelms.
I’m overdue to write about the broader context in Wisconsin, mostly because progress on curriculum improvement has stalled, and I should continue the story. Also, Wisconsin elects a new state superintendent this week, so it’s a good time to revisit the tenure of state superintendent Jill Underly.
From a national lens, Wisconsin offers a cautionary tale for everyone calling to shift power back to states and for the legislated path to literacy gains.
Wisconsin’s Legacy And the Underly Era
Wisconsin is one of the rare states that elects its state superintendent, and this seems to have the unfortunate effect of politicizing the role more than usual. The state’s Department of Public Instruction (DPI) is described by locals as a “political factory.” Current governor Tony Evers is a former state superintendent, so DPI roles are viewed as a political springboard. Notably, Deputy Superintendent Thomas McCarthy has no education background, he’s a career state politico.
This context helps explain why the state has a lackluster track record on academics. In addition, DPI literacy leaders are known to follow discredited educational philosophies.
Barbara Novak, the Director of Early Literacy, is a historic Balanced Literacy devotee. Novak is the former President of the Wisconsin Reading Association (WSRA), which lobbied against the WI Dyslexia Guidebook and the recent Act 20 literacy legislation. She has been with DPI for more than a decade; during that time, DPI has made few efforts to advance “science of reading” initiatives, in stark contrast to the other states.
A few illustrative stories:
——
more.
——-
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
I’m Gen X. I was pretty young when I earned my PhD, so I’ve been a professor for a long time—over 30 years. If you’re not in academia, or it’s been a while since you were in college, you might not know this: the students are not what they used to be. The problem with even talking about this topic at all is the knee-jerk response of, “yeah, just another old man complaining about the kids today, the same way everyone has since Gilgamesh. Shake your fist at the clouds, dude.”So yes, I’m ready to hear that. Go right ahead. Because people need to know.
First, some context. I teach at a regional public university in the United States. Our students are average on just about any dimension you care to name—aspirations, intellect, socio-economic status, physical fitness. They wear hoodies and yoga pants and like Buffalo wings. They listen to Zach Bryan and Taylor Swift. That’s in no way a put-down: I firmly believe that the average citizen deserves a shot at a good education and even more importantly a shot at a good life. All I mean is that our students are representative; they’re neither the bottom of the academic barrel nor the cream off the top.
As with every college we get a range of students, and our best philosophy majors have gone on to earn PhDs or go to law school. We’re also an NCAA Division 2 school and I watched one of our graduates become an All-Pro lineman for the NFL. These are exceptions, and what I say here does not apply to every single student. But what I’m about to describe are the average students at Average State U.
Reading
Most of our students are functionally illiterate. This is not a joke. By “functionally illiterate” I mean “unable to read and comprehend adult novels by people like Barbara Kingsolver, Colson Whitehead, and Richard Powers.” I picked those three authors because they are all recent Pulitzer Prize winners, an objective standard of “serious adult novel.” Furthermore, I’ve read them all and can testify that they are brilliant, captivating writers; we’re not talking about Finnegans Wakehere. But at the same time they aren’t YA, romantasy, or Harry Potter either.
———
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
I have made one more update to my State Curriculum Map tracker.
While @WisconsinDPI stopped maintaining the website with 2021 curriculum data by district, parents retained the info, so have been able to publish it openly. Link added.
Note that parents are also the only source of 2024-25 curriculum data by district in WI.
Why is this transparency work falling to parents? A fair question to ask of @underlyforwi.
Samah Sisay of the Center for Constitutional Rights told Zeteo that one’s visa being revoked does not mean that their status would be too. Unlike student visas – which are entry documents that allow someone to enter the country – student statuses are what allow people to stay in the US. To maintain one’s status, a student has to fulfill certain requirements, like being properly enrolled in classes, keeping documents up to date, and following work restrictions.
A student’s visa could expire or be revoked for any number of reasons, but that wouldn’t necessarily mean their status to stay would be taken away, too. Some of these statuses, which are typically overseen by university officers, are now allegedly being unilaterally revoked by ICE instead. While university officers often oversee status in the SEVIS system, Sisay said that DHS can technically revoke status without a university actively disenrolling a student.
Still, the practice is alarming students and university staff across the country. As one official put it, “Someone at ICE pushed a button, and now [students] are ‘illegal’ through a process that absolutely should not be happening.”
Some of my liberal friends have expressed their unhappiness over my endorsement of Brittany Kinser for State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
So, let me expand on my reasons.
When I was at the city of Madison and there was a managerial opening I always first thought about how that department was functioning. If things were going good, I’d want to promote from within. If things were rocky, I’ld look to the outside.
You can’t take an honest look at DPI and conclude that things are in good shape there. Wisconsin is behind average on test scores, behind most states on recovery after COVID, not great on attendance and we have the widest racial achievement gap of any state in the nation.
So, the first question I need to ask is, why do we want to stick with the status quo?
Well, the status quo has a ready answer: it’s just a question of money. To be exact, the incumbent, Jill Underly, wants to spend the state’s entire $4 billion surplus on public education. But she proposes no changes, no reforms and she would ask for no accountability — no improvements in test scores or anything else. It also just doesn’t add up because if we use all that one-time money in this biennium, what do we do in the next one?
Moreover, it’s just simply untrue that money is the problem for most districts. In fact, last year Wisconsin communities passed referendums worth more in total than any year in history. Here in Madison we haven’t voted down a school referendum in 20 years and we just passed the largest combined operating and capital referendums in our history — a total of $506 million. Milwaukee also passed its largest referendum ever.
—
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Cashless societies may be a sad fact of modern life for those with a nostalgic attachment to the pound in their pocket, but doctors have discovered one unexpected benefit of the decline of coins.
Far fewer children are having surgery after swallowing small items that could choke or kill them, and the scarcity of loose change is likely to be the reason.
The number of children in England needing an operation to remove a foreign body from their nose, throat or airway fell significantly between 2012 and 2022, NHS figures show.
The fall has been greeted with relief by doctors and surgeons, who for years have been warning of the dangers posed by young children ingesting magnets, tiny batteries and other risky objects.
The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in knowledge workflows raises questions about its impact on critical thinking skills and practices.
We survey 319 knowledge workers to investigate 1) when and how they perceive the enaction of critical thinking when using GenAI, and 2) when and why GenAI affects their effort to do so.
Participants shared 936 first-hand examples of using GenAI in work tasks. Quantitatively, when considering both task- and user-specific factors, a user’s task-specific self-confidence and confidence in GenAI are predictive of whether critical thinking is enacted and the effort of doing so in GenAI-assisted tasks. Specifically, higher confidence in GenAI is associated with less critical thinking, while higher self-confidence is associated with more critical thinking. Qualitatively, GenAI shifts the nature of critical thinking toward information verification, response integration, and task stewardship. Our insights reveal new design challenges and opportunities for developing GenAI tools for knowledge work.
New public recordsreleased Thursday by the Institute for Reforming Government’s (IRG) Center for Investigative Oversight reveal how the Department of Public Instruction’s lenient enforcement of Milwaukee Public Schools’ 2024 finance deadlines set up different, more destructive outcomes than DPI’s stricter enforcement in previous years.
Superintendent Underly’s DPI released the records March 5, 2025, 8 months after IRG’s June 17, 2024, request. DPI fulfilled the complete records request only after IRG, represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, threatened legal action.
WHY IT MATTERS
DPI took a gentler approach with MPS than other school districts in years past, despite accurate financial documents being essential to determining state aid for all Wisconsin school districts. DPI has the ability to withhold funding if districts miss deadlines.
——
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
When students begin the journey of learning Japanese, they are met with a fascinating yet complex writing system composed of three scripts: Hiragana, Katakana, and Kanji. Take, for example, the sentence “新しいゲームを買いました。” (Atarashii geemu o kaimashita.), which means “I bought a new game.”
It’s the parents of those high-achieving students who are demanding the change and they’re demanding it in response to new state programs granting automatic admissions to the UW for kids who rank in the top 5% of their classes and automatic admissions to UW campuses outside of Madison for those in the top 10%.
The current system doesn’t work because, in addition to there being no weighting of grades, there isn’t even any class rankings. So, how can you tell if any kid is in the top 10%? Even worse, the district has been trying to move away from assigning grades at all with a pilot program at one high school which would replace letter grades with “Advanced,” “Proficient,” “Developing” or “Emerging.” (I note that there are only four of these and so none that equates to an “F.” I assume that if there were one it would be something like “Could Be The Next Einstein.”)
The bottom line here is that merit is finding its way back into the Madison public schools. This whole movement — no weighted grading, no class rankings, downplaying letter grades altogether — is born of the notion that merit is just a construct of the oppressors. And the liberal parents of those high-achieving kids might actually buy that in theory.
Until it stands in the way of their kid getting into the UW.
——
“Grades” and the taxpayer funded Madison school District
I’m Gen X. I was pretty young when I earned my PhD, so I’ve been a professor for a long time—over 30 years. If you’re not in academia, or it’s been awhile since you were in college, you might not know this: the students are not what they used to be. The problem with even talking about this topic at all is the knee-jerk response of, “yeah, just another old man complaining about the kids today, the same way everyone has since Gilgamesh. Shake your fist at the clouds, dude.”1 So yes, I’m ready to hear that. Go right ahead. Because people need to know.
First, some context. I teach at a regional public university in the US. Our students are average on just about any dimension you care to name—aspirations, intellect, socio-economic status, physical fitness. They wear hoodies and yoga pants and like Buffalo wings. They listen to Zach Bryan and Taylor Swift. That’s in no way a put-down: I firmly believe that the average citizen deserves a shot at a good education and even more importantly a shot at a good life. All I mean is that our students are representative; they’re neither the bottom of the academic barrel nor the cream off the top.
As with every college we get a range of students, and our best philosophy majors have gone on to earn PhDs or go to law school. We’re also an NCAA Division 2 school and I watched one of our graduates become an All-Pro lineman for the Saints. These are exceptions, and what I say here does not apply to every single student. But what I’m about to describe are the average students at Average State U.——-
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
SSFP student reporters and local journalists interview candidates for this year’s school board race. If you missed our forum, now’s your chance to catch up! Stay informed and get to know who’s on the ballot.
——
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
SF on Saturday morning: a large % of Waymos are ferrying solo kids (8-14 yo), presumably to sports or other activities.
A friend told me that 85% of parents at their kids’ SF school use Waymo for kids pickup / drop off: earlier it was ~10% using Uber and Lyft.
Shows how Waymo has grown by expanding the market, serving segments who otherwise were non-consumers of ride sharing.
What exactly is a “continuing resolution”? What’s the difference between an “omnibus” and a “minibus”? And why do these always seem to come with the threat of a government shutdown every few months? My conversation with @RepThomasMassie.
Martin Goodson, then of the Royal Statistical Society, dubbed the ATI “at best irrelevant to the development of modern AI in the UK”.
The criticism hasn’t slowed. Matt Clifford’s AI Opportunities Action Plan recommended that the government should “consider the broad institutional landscape and the full potential of the Alan Turing Institute to drive progress at the cutting edge”. While Clifford was too diplomatic to say the quiet bit out loud, in government speak, this is code for suggesting that the ATI was not fulfilling its intended purpose.
UK Research and Innovation, the UK’s main research and innovation funding body, is running out of patience. Its quinquennial review of the ATI, published in 2024, was politely scathing about the institute’s governance, financial management, and the quality of its most recent strategy (dubbed Turing 2.0).
There aren’t many areas of consensus across the UK’s fractious tech community, but the ATI has come to play an oddly unifying role. From left to right and north to south, there’s a sense that the institute is running out of friends and time.
Large language models display impressive capabilities. However, for the most part, the mechanisms by which they do so are unknown. The black-box nature of models is increasingly unsatisfactory as they advance in intelligence and are deployed in a growing number of applications. Our goal is to reverse engineer how these models work on the inside, so we may better understand them and assess their fitness for purpose.
The challenges we face in understanding language models resemble those faced by biologists. Living organisms are complex systems which have been sculpted by billions of years of evolution. While the basic principles of evolution are straightforward, the biological mechanisms it produces are spectacularly intricate. Likewise, while language models are generated by simple, human-designed training algorithms, the mechanisms born of these algorithms appear to be quite complex.
And the companies are not wrong about genuinely impressive improvements. Six years ago in this newsletter, I wrote about some initial testing I had been doing with computer vision APIs from Google and Microsoft, a first attempt to analyze the photo morgue my library had recently acquired from the Boston Globe. There were glimmers of hope that these pre-GPT tools could help us identify topics in millions of photographs that lacked rigorous metadata, and I found even 80% accuracy to be promising. Now our library’s digital team, much more capable than I am, has created an abstracted interface to all of the main multimodal AI services and is testing the ability of these services to provide subject headings and descriptions, with much better results (although all of the services are still imperfect).
Fellow historian Benjamin Breen has documented similar advances in his testing of AI. The latest models are scarily on par with a first-year doctoral student in history in some areas, able to provide solid context and advanced interpretations of documents and images, even complex ones that require substantial background in a field. The frontier models are much better than most doctoral students in other tasks, such as translation and transcription. Handwriting recognition for historical documents, in particular, has been among the hardest problems for computer scientists to solve, and cracking it will have a significant impact on historical research. Historian Cameron Blevins has shown that custom GPTs are now on a path to a solution that could make archives and special collections much more searchable and readable in ways that might transform our ability to do history. What these other tests of artificial intelligence show is that significant AI progress may lie not in some kind of examination endgame, of perfect answers to tough questions, but in the important, but often hidden, middle stages of a research project, when evidence is being assembled and interpreted.
WisPolitics summary:
Co-author Sen. John Jagler, R-Watertown, said the standards give parents a false impression of how their kids are doing in school. He also said it’s a problem that data can’t be compared year-to-year, which is problematic considering learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic.
He said the state should go back to the previous standards put in place when Evers led DPI.
“We need to do better, we need to go back,” Jagler said, referencing his comments to DPI during the public hearing on the bill.
Sen. Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee, criticized what he called “huffing and puffing” about the changes, asserting standards were never lowered and were part of periodic changes that take place over the years.
——-
Those new standards lowered the threshold for what is considered proficient on the Forward Exam state test, and replaced terms like “below basic” with “developing.”
———
He vetoes it. Makes perfect sense. #disappointed
——-
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
In 1994, the General Assembly awoke to a then-unheard-of pension debt of $17 billion. In typical Illinois fashion, lawmakers cooked up a 50-year repayment plan to “fix” the problem. It was called a ramp because little of the debt was repaid immediately, and most of it was pushed out decades into the future. A graphic of the repayment schedule looks exactly like an upward-sloping ramp. Gov. Jim Edgar signed the bill into law, giving it its name.
Conveniently, all pension benefit increases passed since then — and any increases in benefit obligations found due to poor actuarial assumptions — have been pushed onto the ramp. It’s how $17 billion in outstanding pension debt at the state level has now turned into a whopping $144 billion.
Every day, researchers search for optimal solutions. They might want to figure out where to build a major airline hub. Or to determine how to maximize return while minimizing risk in an investment portfolio. Or to develop self-driving cars that can distinguish between traffic lights and stop signs.
Mathematically, these problems get translated into a search for the minimum values of functions. But in all these scenarios, the functions are too complicated to assess directly. Researchers have to approximate the minimal values instead.
It turns out that one of the best ways to do this is by using an algorithm that Isaac Newton developed over 300 years ago. This algorithm is fairly simple. It’s a little like searching, blindfolded, for the lowest point in an unfamiliar landscape. As you put one foot in front of the other, the only information you need is whether you’re going uphill or downhill, and whether the grade is increasing or decreasing. Using that information, you can get a good approximation of the minimum relatively quickly.
Although enormously powerful — centuries later, Newton’s method is still crucial for solving present-day problems in logistics, finance, computer vision and even pure math — it also has a significant shortcoming. It doesn’t work well on all functions. So mathematicians have continued to study the technique, figuring out different ways to broaden its scope without sacrificing efficiency.
Last summer, three researchers announced the latest improvement to Newton’s method. Amir Ali Ahmadi of Princeton University, along with his former students Abraar Chaudhry (now at the Georgia Institute of Technology) and Jeffrey Zhang (now at Yale University), extended Newton’s method to work efficiently on the broadest class of functions yet.
Steve Davis of @DOGE: “The reason I’m here is… I think the goal is incredibly inspiring. I think most of the taxpayers in the country would agree that the country going bankrupt would be a very bad thing… I think the thing that’s special right now, is we actually believe there is a chance to succeed. That there is an administration that is supportive and a great cabinet and just a great group that will actually make success a possible outcome.”
——-
US Debt clock.
Open the Books took a look at where else the department’s money has been going in its fruitless pursuit of better outcomes.
Our auditors made the big picture clear recently, as auditors traced every agency’s headcount and spending changes over the decades (READ MORE: MAPPING GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT)
The department’s headcount has actually decreased slightly since 2000, by about 13.9% (4,930 vs. 4,245). But by 2024 annual spending was 749% of what they’d been at the turn of the Millenium! (Open the Books, FOX News)
What follows is just a brief laundry list of wasteful spending examples that can help explain the explosive growth.
These grants from recent years include some of the usual suspects like DEI and gender politics…plus millions headed to Chinese firms!
——
Instructors: Arne Duncan, Margaret Spellings
Perspectives from Former US Secretaries of Education
Featured Speakers: Arne Duncan (Obama administration) and Margaret Spellings (GW Bush administration)
Moderator: Dr. Simon J. Bronner
Location: Lunt-Fontanne Theatre on the UWM at Waukesha campus, 1500 N. University Dr., Waukesha, WI
Sponsored by the Tommy G. Thompson Center on Public Leadership and hosted by UWM at Waukesha.Free and open to the public, registration required.
WisPolitics email summary:
The record spending in Wisconsin’s state schools superintendent race between education consultant Brittany Kinser and incumbent Jill Underly has now hit $4.5 million.
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
From Chief Judge Eric Melgren’s opinion yesterday in Schmidt v. Huff (D. Kan.):
Gardner Edgerton High School is a part of USD 231 and is located in Johnson County, Kansas. USD 231’s Superintendent is Defendant Brian Huff. Plaintiff Carrie Schmidt is the mother of two students, a sophomore and a senior, who attend Gardner Edgerton High School.
Plaintiff’s son, a high school senior, is on the Gardner Edgerton wrestling team. Plaintiff volunteered to help make “snack bags” for the wrestlers on the days they have wrestling matches. With permission, Plaintiff uses the teacher’s lounge on the first floor to put together the snack bags. Once the snack bags are made, they are placed in the wrestling team’s coolers. Plaintiff often takes pictures of the completed snack bags and sends them to the coaches and Athletic Secretary, so they know where everything is located. This system was already in place before Plaintiff volunteered. Plaintiff has helped make snack bags for the wrestling team since at least 2023.
USC went woke, now it’s BROKE.
A new, just released internal memo reveals that @USC—where tuition is a staggering $73,260—relied heavily on $1.35B in federal funding last year.
Here’s what’s happening:
One of the key areas in which Americans voted for change on November 5, 2024 was education. Candidate Donald Trump promised to overhaul it in multiple ways, even to eliminating the bureaucratic and useless US Department of Education under which education has only gotten worse.
President Trump has a reputation for honoring his pledges and it is already apparent he is moving forward.
Education—public, private or homeschooled—is arguably the most important function of a free society. It is also among the most complex, affecting nearly every citizen.
The process of reform will take years as the failures in our system have been many. No one person or initiative can do it alone. Even with DEI putatively jettisoned and education policy returned to the states, where it was always intended to be, much work remains.
The Inoculator encompasses one specific but hugely important area.
Lie to me just once, just once, and I’ll burn you to the ground.
It wasn’t an empty threat. Chicago politics wasn’t a cloistered convent. It was and remains a place of thieves protected by the laws and regulations that they themselves controlled. It is a Democrat Barter Town and like all such towns it is hell bent on strangling itself. And there was one top aide to the mayor who thought himself a master manipulator. Frank lied to me and I burned him.
I burned him repeatedly, mercilessly, using a line often attributed to the poet Richard Brautigan: “He’d sell a rat’s asshole to a blind man for a wedding ring.”
Political Chicago understood. He lied. But I would never use “asshole” in the paper. We had editors. So I adapted it to say Frank was the kind of weasel who’d sell dead rats on coat hangers to a blind man for earmuffs. His boss, the mayor, once asked me about the feud with Frank. He lied to me, I said. The mayor shrugged, said nothing more because he knew Frank.
I never spoke to Frank again, never trusted his word, even his allies were dead to me. He eventually left town. I think he’s a goatherd now.
Alex Shieh thought the ask was simple enough: In so many words, justify your job. Last week, the Brown University sophomore emailed the more than 3,500 administrators and staff members who work for his institution, requesting that they explain “how Brown students would be impacted if your position was eliminated.”
More.
$93,064 tuition. 3,805 administrators on payroll. A $46 million structural budget deficit. Illegal DEI programs jeopardizing federal funding.
We emailed every administrator and asked them about their jobs. Instead of answering, someone from a Brown IP address hacked our site.
fIRE.
You recently mentioned the Alpha School and their claims about AI tutoring. I share the skepticism expressed in your comments section regarding selection bias and the lack of validated academic benchmarks.
I wanted to highlight a more rigorously evaluated project called Tutor CoPilot, conducted jointly by Stanford’s NSSA and the online tutoring firm FEVTutor (sadly they’ve since gone bankrupt). To my knowledge, it’s the first and only RCT examining AI-assisted tutoring in real K-12 school districts.
Here’s the study: https://nssa.stanford.edu/studies/tutor-copilot-human-ai-approach-scaling-real-time-expertise
Key findings:
- Immediate session-level learning outcomes improved by 4-9%.
- Remarkably, the tool impacted tutors even more than students. After six weeks, inexperienced tutors reached performance parity with seasoned tutors, and previously low-performing tutors achieved average-level results.
Sixty-four days have passed since the Dairyland Sentinel filed an open records request with the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) and State Superintendent, Dr Jill Underly. Underly and the Department have yet to hand over the records, despite the legal requirement to do so.
The request, submitted Jan. 21, seeks details on controversial changes to the state’s Forward Exam’s performance benchmarks and grading terms—changes critics say lower state education standards and obscure student performance data.
The Dairyland Sentinel, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit outlet that publishes a website and newsletter on Wisconsin history and current events, filed an official open records request for communications, documents, analyses, and meeting records tied to the revisions, which took effect at Underly’s direction.
As of March 26, the DPI has provided only a list of nearly 100 experts backing Underly’s decisions, a response that falls short of addressing the specific records sought.
——-
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
Many prospective students and their families are dissatisfied with higher education today, some because of questions of financial efficacy (is it worth it?), yet more because of that evident bias pervading the vast majority of our colleges, often obscuring or distorting learning and turning education into propaganda.
Still, many of these same students have good and necessary reasons for wanting to attend a college, whether at a state school nearby or one far away.
The Inoculator therefore provides a roadmap for them and their families to how we believe students can best avoid this indoctrination in whatever college they choose among the nearly 3000 in our country.
Since the heaviest indoctrination usually occurs in the required general education courses, The Inoculator provides a specific guide to the best (least biased) of those courses.
Arranged by general education categories, we believe these classes are less apt to indoctrinate and offer the best chance of a valuable education and true learning.
This has been done in a highly specific, detailed manner, that we do not believe can be found elsewhere.
A clear invasion on the privacy rights of families and likely unconstitutional, Rep. Terra Costa Howard’s homeschooling bill imposes unreasonable demands on private education not required of the public schools. It would essentially criminalize parents who do not comply.
Hypocrisy at its worst, Costa Howard’s bill is based on a single, tragic story of homeschooling child abuse, while ignoring scores of sexual abuse and misconduct cases by public school staff. In 2023 alone, CPS had 443 ongoing cases of sexual abuse and misconduct.
Costa Howard’s bill is the latest attempt to restrict homeschooling, and part of a broader push by teacher unions to eliminate any alternatives for poor, middle-income families, who are forced to enroll their children in inadequate and often failing or unsafe neighborhood public schools.
——
But let’s give tech companies some credit. They have improved one skill among current students—cheating, which has now reached epic proportions.
The situation is so extreme that more than 40% of students were caught cheating recently—and it happened in an ethics class!
The professor caught them in a simple way. He simply uploaded a copy of his final exam on to the web, but with wrong answers.
“Most of these answers were not just wrong, but obviously wrong to anyone who had paid attention in class,” he adds. But “40 out of 96 students looked at and used the planted final for at least a critical mass of questions.”
Another teacher shares a similar lament: “I used to teach students. Now I catch ChatGPT cheats.”
I once believed my students and I were in this together, engaged in a shared intellectual pursuit. That faith has been obliterated over the past few semesters.
Legal education in the United States stands at a critical juncture. As democracy faces mounting threats both at home and abroad, law schools must grapple with their role in shaping not just competent lawyers but engaged citizens capable of safeguarding and improving democratic processes. Yet the traditional model of teaching students to “think like a lawyer” may be inadvertently undermining the very values and norms essential to stabilizing our democracy. Indeed, from Watergate to the January 6th attacks on the U.S. Capitol, lawyers have played key roles in efforts to undermine democracy. This essay reflects on this phenomenon, exploring why law schools produce lawyers so willing to thwart democracy, at times using their law licenses to do so.
Drawing insights from two theories of democracy—deliberative democracy and contestatory democracy, it instead proposes “critical curriculum design” as a method for training future lawyers not just to be skilled technicians, but also active participants in sustaining and improving our democracy. Specifically, it contends that law schools should cultivate the qualities of “engaged citizenship,” including the ability to bridge divides among people with diverse perspectives, the readiness to challenge overreach by people in positions of authority, and the capacity to imagine alternative legal frameworks. The essay then concludes by proposing concrete strategies for regularizing these democratic competencies across the law school experience.
. As parents, we often have goals for our children: We want them to get a good education, learn to swim and ride a bike, and become good workers, partners, friends and savers.
Beyond these “musts,” many of us try to share our particular expertise with them. The mother of one of my childhood friends was an artist, and she passed her skills and passion on to her four children. Or perhaps we try to share practical knowledge—how to build shelves, cook tasty meals or buy a car.
But what’s a mother to do when her expertise involves the U.S. tax code? Yes, as Benjamin Franklin pointed out, taxes are one of life’s two certainties, and they touch every facet of our lives. Tax knowledge is highly useful.
“We’re voting for Kinser as much as we’re voting against incumbent Jill Underly. Underly is underwhelming. In our view, she rigged state test scores just before the election to make her record look better. Even Gov. Tony Evers, who once held her job, disagreed with her. Then she further eroded her credibility by submitting a budget that spent all of the state’s $4 billion surplus on public schools. For one thing, once the surplus has been spent, what do you do in the next biennium? For another thing, nobody takes a proposal like that seriously. It’s just transparent pandering. And finally, it continues the very problem that Kinser might address: the see-no-evil nature of the public schools establishment. Their idea is that all you need to do is spend more money on the same failing system and everything will be fine. Kinser would be a breath of fresh air. She’s got great experience, having been a special ed teacher in the Chicago public schools. She was even a union member and was an opponent of charter schools and vouchers. Then she experienced them and became a convert. But that’s not all she’s about. She’s young and energetic and not at all partisan. It’s unfortunate that she’s gotten the backing of big Republican donors because it paints her as something she’s not. But campaigns need money and Democrats and the teachers union have fallen in behind Underly and the same old, same old failing establishment. Moreover, Underly hasn’t shown up for a single forum, while Kinser has taken every invitation. Underly doesn’t even feel the need to defend her positions. (I can’t blame her for that.) She figures she’ll just ride on Crawford’s coattails. She doesn’t deserve another four years. DPI needs big changes. Kinser might provide them.”
——
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
