US Education Secretary Miguel Cardona this week embarked on a five-state bus tour to “fight for public education.” His campaign, amplified on social media, is ostensibly to rally support for traditional public schools. However, this “fight” is built on two flawed assumptions that, when scrutinized, reveal both the limitations of Cardona’s vision and an overtly political agenda. What Cardona is really fighting for is Kamala Harris’ White House bid (three of the five states on the tour are swing states critical to Democrats’ chances in November) and to enshrine in voters’ minds a narrow and impoverished view of public education strictly limited to traditional, district-run schools—a view that is already becoming an anachronism as new models and mechanisms for educating America’s children continue to gain traction post-Covid.
Cardona, who was Connecticut’s education commissioner before he was plucked from obscurity and named Education Secretary by President Biden, tweeted earlier this week that public schools are a “powerful engine driving the American Dream.” Isn’t it pretty to think so? This homily suggests that public schools are an equalizing force, particularly for low-income students and students of color. The reality has never matched the rhetoric: Despite decades of reform efforts, substantial public investment, and increased staffing levels, outcomes in public schools, especially those serving disadvantaged communities, have barely budged in half a century, leaving many students ill-prepared for college or the workforce.