Connie Marshner

A computer-based curriculum effectively cuts parents out of the helping process. The school district where I worked issues Chromebook laptops to second graders, and from then on, everything happens on that machine. It’s like that in many schools across the country.

Even the books elementary students are supposed to read for “free reading” are preloaded onto it. The teacher “assesses” their progress by seeing that they clicked pages open. There are expensive illustrated paper readers in lower grades, but those don’t leave the classroom. In one history class in a high school, I saw some textbooks stacked in a corner, but students told me they were never opened. At every level, all classwork is done on the Chromebook and sent to the internet cloud, where an acknowledgment of the work is entered into the teacher’s electronic record book—perhaps the fact that the work was “completed.”

If there is any homework, which there usually isn’t in elementary school, it’s done on the Chromebook. By sixth grade, a parent cannot see homework unless her child logs in while sitting beside the parent—but that only works if the child hasn’t already clicked to submit it to the teacher before mom or dad has found the time to sit down. With this digital system, a parent can’t know what his child doesn’t know—and thus cannot support the teacher by reinforcing or reteaching lessons at home. 

Third, computerization hinders, not helps, the learning process. 

Neuroscience shows that the effort of writing with the hand intrinsically enhances and reinforces the learning process in the brain. But even in kindergarten, the classroom is dominated by the “smart board.” In the classes where I was an aide or a teacher, kindergartners actually wrote with their hands for about 15 minutes of their six-hour days—not counting filling in worksheets. From second grade on, everything is done on Chromebooks.