Last year, I wrote about a specific, promising development in Wisconsin: the state published the strongest ELA curriculum list in the country.
Unfortunately, the work in Wisconsin prior to that development, and since, underwhelms.
I’m overdue to write about the broader context in Wisconsin, mostly because progress on curriculum improvement has stalled, and I should continue the story. Also, Wisconsin elects a new state superintendent this week, so it’s a good time to revisit the tenure of state superintendent Jill Underly.
From a national lens, Wisconsin offers a cautionary tale for everyone calling to shift power back to states and for the legislated path to literacy gains.
Wisconsin’s Legacy And the Underly Era
Wisconsin is one of the rare states that elects its state superintendent, and this seems to have the unfortunate effect of politicizing the role more than usual. The state’s Department of Public Instruction (DPI) is described by locals as a “political factory.” Current governor Tony Evers is a former state superintendent, so DPI roles are viewed as a political springboard. Notably, Deputy Superintendent Thomas McCarthy has no education background, he’s a career state politico.
This context helps explain why the state has a lackluster track record on academics. In addition, DPI literacy leaders are known to follow discredited educational philosophies.
Barbara Novak, the Director of Early Literacy, is a historic Balanced Literacy devotee. Novak is the former President of the Wisconsin Reading Association (WSRA), which lobbied against the WI Dyslexia Guidebook and the recent Act 20 literacy legislation. She has been with DPI for more than a decade; during that time, DPI has made few efforts to advance “science of reading” initiatives, in stark contrast to the other states.
A few illustrative stories:
——
more.
——-
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly.
