Scott Jaschik

For many years, critics of the SAT have cited a verbal question involving the word “regatta” as an example of how the test may favor wealthier test-takers, who also are more likely to be white. It’s been a long time since the regatta question was used — and the College Board now has in place a detailed process for testing all questions and potential questions, designed to weed out questions that may favor one group of students over another.
But a major new research project — led by a scholar who favors standardized testing — has just concluded that the methods used by the College Board (and just about every other testing entity for either admissions or employment testing) are seriously flawed. While the new research doesn’t conclude that the tests are biased, it says that they could be — and that the existing methods of detection wouldn’t reveal that.