Let’s say you are an economist who believes that higher taxes spent on infrastructure would be good for the nation. The right may fight you. They may call you a name like “Libtard” or “Commie”. And that is absolutely awful behavior to me. Truly. But they aren’t nearly as likely to coordinate behind the scenes in emails to be discovered later and all agree to pretend, seemingly independently, that as a former expert you have committed some unclear moral crime that means you can never be empaneled or invited onto a commission. They aren’t immediately going to treat you like a mental patient, a con-artist, or threat to society. They are just going to be asses. That’s the dopey game they love: “Happy Warriors” is what they call it.
And the subjects I focus on most tend to be the places where I think dissenting experts are being gaslit:
COVID ORIGINS
SOUTHERN BORDER
STRING THEORY
POTUS COGNITIVE STATE AND AGE
EPSTEIN’S INTELLIGENCE CONNECTION
COVID MANAGEMENT
QUESTIONING UKRAINE NATO STRATEGY
INFLATION/GROWTH MEASUREMENT
MONETARY AGGREGATES AND FED INTERVENTION
VP COMPETENCY