What Has Changed
AI is dramatically better than it was a year ago. New models have emerged that are not just incrementally improved but fundamentally more capable.
That part is clear. What hasn’t changed requires a longer conversation.
What Has Not Changed
- Direct Instruction Remains Critical for Improving Student Outcomes
Direct Instruction in the Engelmann tradition remains the most effective method of teaching we have — not because the evidence is beyond dispute, but because it follows the discipline of engineering: analyze, design, field-test, evaluate, revise — the same cycle that produces reliable software, bridges, and aircraft. Engelmann did not start with ideology and then try to make kids fit it. He started with a logical analysis of the stimuli and the kids’ behavior — their responses, their performance, their errors — and kept iterating until they learned. Cognitive science and the broader science of learning have spent more than 50 years confirming what this process produced, through both direct and indirectresearch. Whether by analog or by digital, by script or by screen, we must teach students effectively and efficiently, using principles of learning science and instructional design.
- Most Schools Lack a Coherent Curriculum
However, most schools don’t even have an articulated, sequenced, cumulative curriculum. What they have is at most a patchwork, or something that lives in the head of individual teachers. It leads to teaching that is built on sand — it is almost irrelevant whether a teacher teaches explicitly or not when what is taught is random slop that was Googled or generated by AI the night before. And it all just keeps moving. A student who failed to master a prerequisite skill three months ago has no mechanism to recover, because the curriculum doesn’t build or circle back. There is also zero transparency — as a parent or a consultant, trying to find out what is being taught in a given grade for a given subject is like going on a scavenger hunt, where at every turn you’re told to just trust the process. This isn’t for kids. This is because the adults can’t get their act together.
——-
A.B.T.: “Ain’t been taught.”
8,897 (!) Madison 4k to 3rd grade students scored lower than 75% of the students in the national comparison group during the 2024-2025 school year.
Madison taxpayers have long supported far above average (now > $26,000 per student) K-12 tax & spending practices. This, despite long term, disastrous reading results.
Madison Schools: More $, No Accountability
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Legislative Letter to Jill Underly on Wisconsin Literacy




