University of Wisconsin Study • Wollack & Fish (2009)
A clear, data-driven analysis of how high school mathematics curricula affect college math readiness. Drawing on placement test results from over 17,000 students and a real-world school curriculum switch, this summary highlights consistent advantages for traditional sequences over reform programs such as Core-Plus.
| Section | Traditional | Reform | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math Basics | 498 | 455 | +43 |
| Algebra | 477 | 446 | +31 |
| Trigonometry | 479 | 448 | +31 |
| Overall | ~49% | ~42% | +7 pts |
All scores standardized (mean = 500, SD = 100)
| Placement Level | Traditional | Reform |
|---|---|---|
| Remedial Math | 10% | 18% |
| Calculus | 13% | 7% |
Real-world evidence: When this Wisconsin high school switched from traditional math to Core-Plus (2004–2007), top graduates immediately showed lower placement scores and ACT-Math results compared to the traditional years.
Traditional high school math sequences (Algebra I → Geometry → Algebra II/Trig → Precalculus) appear to build stronger foundational skills aligned with college expectations. Reform curricula showed particular gaps in advanced algebra, functions, trigonometry identities, and exponentials/logs.
The University of Wisconsin placement test itself does not favor one curriculum over another. The performance differences reflect what students actually learned in high school.